[nq:1]Good morning![/nq] Good Morning! and Happy Labor Day (celebrated)! [nq:1]I wonder what the correct abbreviation for ounces is: a) 2.7 oz b) 2.7 ozs c) 2.7 ozs.[/nq] No, none are right. There's no "2.7" involved in abbreviating "ounces". ) Other than that, it is not usual to add the "s" to the end of the "oz" . [nq:1]Thanks for your thoughts... Klaus[/nq] I wanna pony,
[nq:1]I wonder what the correct abbreviation for ounces is: a) 2.7 oz b) 2.7 ozs c) 2.7 ozs.[/nq] Your question involves two things: (1) Is the "s" used with the abbreviation to show plural number, and (2) Is there a period (point? dot? stop?) after the abbreviation?
To the first of them, the New Shorter Oxford implies the answer is no, with the definition oz. = ounce(s) As fo
[nq:1]As for the period after the abbreviation, we've been told that British practice is to not use it, but the above example from a British dictionary seems to contradict that information.[/nq] My understanding, such as it is, of the UKan full-stop-after- abbreviations policy is that the period is omitted only when the abbreviation ends with the last letter of the word; e.g., "Mr" for Mister,
[nq:2]As for the period after the abbreviation, we've been told ... example from a British dictionary seems to contradict that information.[/nq] [nq:1]My understanding, such as it is, of the UKan full-stop-after- abbreviations policy is that the period is omitted only when ... for Mister, "Dr" for Doctor. By that logic "oz." would be correct,since Z is not the last letter of "ounce".[/nq]
[nq:2]Yes, but it replaces the full stop. In fact, I ... a flourish which happened to look rather zeddish in manuscript.[/nq] [nq:1]I think you're right. It's one of the apothecaries' symbols along with that for drams and scruples. See them here: ... of prescription cough syrup that had symbols like this molded into the glass bottle. This was in the late Sixties.[/nq] I liked those meticul
[nq:2]As for the period after the abbreviation, we've been told ... example from a British dictionary seems to contradict that information.[/nq] [nq:1]My understanding, such as it is, of the UKan full-stop-after- abbreviations policy is that the period is omitted only when ... Mister, "Dr" for Doctor. By that logic "oz." would be correct, since Z is not the last letter of "ounce".[/nq] But
[nq:2]My understanding, such as it is, of the UKan full-stop-after- ... correct, since Z is not the last letter of "ounce".[/nq] [nq:1]But isn't there something about mensuration units not being abbreviations but symbols, so they don't take the full stop?[/nq] Having proudly recalled my Eng. Lit. syllabus from 1959 in another thread, I'm brought crashing down to earth by a total lack of re
[nq:1]Good morning! I wonder what the correct abbreviation for ounces is: a) 2.7 oz b) 2.7 ozs c) 2.7 ozs.[/nq] The Chicago Manual of Style, 14th Ed., says that the singular and plural of English measures are "identical", so 1 oz. and 2.1 oz. would be the way to do it.
Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor For email, replace numbers with English alphabet.
[nq:2]My understanding, such as it is, of the UKan full-stop-after- ... correct, since Z is not the last letter of "ounce".[/nq] [nq:1]Yes, but it replaces the full stop. In fact, I think it was invented before the full stop became the rule. My understanding is that the z isn't really a z, but a flourish which happened to look rather zeddish in manuscript.[/nq] The RHUD and MWCD-11 say it'