[nq:2]What's equally pitiful is that Alan Brooks allows ad hominen unprovoked attacks on any regular poster in the group. So much for "moderated."[/nq] Fine. Let's start by dealing with the self-serving hypocritical mouth- breathing putrified trash* parading as "human" that offers support and an attentive ear as a ploy to get into women's underpants, then insults them and exposes their most pr
You have no life that is evident. You've posted unprovoked ad hominen attacks on me before. It's not a stretch, given your repeated, demonstrated low mental condition, to expect something like you. If you want to see paranoia, look in the mirror. And maybe someday, try writing a screenplay.
[nq:1]Fine. Let's start by dealing with the self-serving hypocritical mouth- breathing putrified trash* parading as "human" that offers support and ... so. jaybee *no offence to actual trash, which can still be useful by being recycled and composted, contrary to Skip.[/nq] Still suffering from writer's block with no one to lash out at to further deflect your mentality, Snoopy?
[nq:1]Well then, Jacques, let's start by dealing with the person who posted 5 years worth of lying **** about me.[/nq] You gave at least as good as you got, Pinky. You don't get to cry foul, but you do get to let bygones be bygones. jaybee
[nq:1]What's equally pitiful is that Alan Brooks allows ad hominen unprovoked attacks on any regular poster in the group. So much for "moderated."[/nq] All of us who were around two years ago agreed on a moderation policy, and I'm sticking to it. The policy did not include censoring people for occasional off-topic posting or personal attacks. You can read the policy here:
[nq:1]No, Jacques. You said despicable things. Whatever I gave, I gave in defense. Big difference.[/nq] Interesting way of remembering it. [nq:1]Unbelievable.[/nq] Only if you presume that Google got it wrong too. jaybee