0
Usenet Posted 19 years ago
Screenwriting

A young Skip Press discovers Scientology.


A very touching story.
  

Top answer

[/nq] What old pseudonym did you abandon before adopting your new *** pseudonym? Was it "Chickenhawk"?

  • [/nq] What old pseudonym did you abandon before adopting your new *** pseudonym?
  • Was it "Chickenhawk"?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

21 Answers
0
[nq:1]
A very touching story.[/nq]
What old pseudonym did you abandon before adopting your new *** pseudonym? Was it "Chickenhawk"?
0
$(Email Removed):
[nq:1]
A very touching story.[/nq]
Is he the one with the man-*****?
jaybee
0
[nq:1]
A very touching story.[/nq]
Another "Adam" provoking Skip? I would have thought one was already too much.
0
[nq:2]
A very touching story.[/nq]
[nq:1]Another "Adam" provoking Skip? I would have thought one was already too much.[/nq]
If it's Jo
0
[nq:2]What's equally pitiful is that Alan Brooks allows ad hominen unprovoked attacks on any regular poster in the group. So much for "moderated."[/nq]
Fine. Let's start by dealing with the self-serving hypocritical mouth- breathing putrified trash* parading as "human" that offers support and an attentive ear as a ploy to get into women's underpants, then insults them and exposes their most pr
0
You have no life that is evident. You've posted unprovoked ad hominen attacks on me before. It's not a stretch, given your repeated, demonstrated low mental condition, to expect something like you. If you want to see paranoia, look in the mirror.
And maybe someday, try writing a screenplay.
0
[nq:1]Fine. Let's start by dealing with the self-serving hypocritical mouth- breathing putrified trash* parading as "human" that offers support and ... so. jaybee *no offence to actual trash, which can still be useful by being recycled and composted, contrary to Skip.[/nq]
Still suffering from writer's block with no one to lash out at to further deflect your mentality, Snoopy?
0
[nq:1]Well then, Jacques, let's start by dealing with the person who posted 5 years worth of lying **** about me.[/nq]
You gave at least as good as you got, Pinky. You don't get to cry foul, but you do get to let bygones be bygones.
jaybee
0
[nq:1]What's equally pitiful is that Alan Brooks allows ad hominen unprovoked attacks on any regular poster in the group. So much for "moderated."[/nq]
All of us who were around two years ago agreed on a moderation policy, and I'm sticking to it. The policy did not include censoring people for occasional off-topic posting or personal attacks. You can read the policy here:
0
[nq:1]No, Jacques. You said despicable things. Whatever I gave, I gave in defense. Big difference.[/nq]
Interesting way of remembering it.
[nq:1]Unbelievable.[/nq]
Only if you presume that Google got it wrong too.
jaybee

Related Questions