0
Pructus Posted 19 years ago
How about rephrasing as belows. Are they grammatically correct and understandable?
A. He has three times as many books as I have. ----> He has books three times as many as I have.
B. A whale is no more a fish than a horse is. -------> A whale is a fish no more than a horse is.
Grammar
A whale is no more a fish than a horse is.
How about rephrasing as belows. Are they grammatically correct and understandable?
A. He has three times as many books as I have. ----> He has books three times as many as I have.
B. A whale is no more a fish than a horse is. -------> A whale is a fish no more than a horse is.
Top answer
Hi, How about rephrasing as belows. Are they grammatically correct and understandable? A.
- Hi, How about rephrasing as belows.
- Are they grammatically correct and understandable?
- A.
- He has three times as many books as I have.
- ----> He has books three times as many as I have.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
2 Answers
0
Hi,
How about rephrasing as belows. Are they grammatically correct and understandable?
A. He has three times as many books as I have. ----> He has books three times as many as I have.<< No, don't use this word order.
B. A whale is no more a fish than a horse is. -------> A wha
How about rephrasing as belows. Are they grammatically correct and understandable?
A. He has three times as many books as I have. ----> He has books three times as many as I have.<< No, don't use this word order.
B. A whale is no more a fish than a horse is. -------> A wha
00
Thanks Guru!
This time, my expectation is not met.... (i.e. I made a wrong assumption that I was writing correct sentences, which turned out to be wrong).
This time, my expectation is not met.... (i.e. I made a wrong assumption that I was writing correct sentences, which turned out to be wrong).
0
Related Questions