A weird sentence

0" will " is an offiical document in this sentence. 0-

0Can you explain your comment? 02br
02br
00" will " is an 01font00offiical document02font00 in this sentence. 02br
02br
00This is indeed a strange sentence! It will make a ilttle sense without the "will". The way it's written, it's not right.0-

0 It means 01i00I can't find the will 02i00(the document that tells what Mr. Simpson wants done with his money and other belongings when he dies) 01i00belonging to Mr. Simpson,02i00( i.e., the will that Mr. Simpson wrote)01i00.02i02br
02br
00 "will" is a noun, not a verb here.02br
02br
00 C

0Oh! that "will". How about Simpson01font00's 02font00will?02br
02br
00By the way, why do native speakers refer "official documents" to their wills? Kind of fun to me.02br
02br
00LcChang0-

0Hello 02br
02br
00I think "Mr. Simpson's" will better than "the Simpson's will" because it is not common to define a noun with two determiners ("the" and "Simpson's"). 02br
02br
00In the United States (and in Japan also) "a will" commonly should be a scripted document made in a way according to strict legal rules. If you are interested, take a look at [u

1font00Ok, I see.02font02br
02br
00Even without " 01font00's 02font00", does the original sentence " 01font00I can't find the Simpson will anywhere." still sound good to you? Please advise. Thanks.02font02br
02br
01font

0 01blockquote

01cite10Lcchang12cite11font10Ok, I see.12font12br
12br
10Even without " 11font10's 12font10", does the original sentence " 11font10I can't find the Simpson will anywhere." still sound good to you? Please adv

0Hi,02br
02br
00There is a subtle difference here.02br
02br
01font00the Simpson will02font00 The adjectival approach suggests the speaker is focused on the will, and is not thinking of Mr. and Mrs. Simpson as people. He doesn't seem to care about them. It's the kind of thing a lawyer would say, who handles a lot of

0 i agree. 0-

0So do I. 02br
02br
00Thanks a lot.02br
02br
00LcChang0-