0
JKBelieve Posted 21 years ago
Grammar

A very confusing passage


'And decisions have been made-by omission, negliect, inertia-that cannot be unmade.'



That just looks really weird...........'decisions have been made that cannot be unmade'



shouldn't it be 'decisions which cannot be unmade have been made' ?
  

Top answer

No, it seems OK to me... I guess the author chose the words and the construction on purpose to make the sentence striking.

  • No, it seems OK to me...
  • I guess the author chose the words and the construction on purpose to make the sentence striking.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
No, it seems OK to me...
I guess the author chose the words and the construction on purpose to make the sentence striking.
0
Yes; 'unmade' as in 'reversed'.

If you make a mess, you can tidy it up ('un-make the mess').

But if you make a cake, you can't 'unmake' it.

MrP
0
I suppose it 'should be' the way you state it, but that's if you want the most neutral way of saying it. You can move a relative clause to the right of its normal position for stylistic effect -- or if it is too long to be easily grasped in the normal position.

CJ
0
Sorry, JK, I misread your question.

MrP
0
Hello JKB

(EX1-a) [Decisions [that cannot be unmade] have been made by omission, neglect, inertia].
(Ex1-b) [Decisions have been made by omission, neglect, inertia] [that cannot be unmade]

As JC said, people often move an adjective that-clause to avoid too long/heavy constituents at the head or in middle of sentences. Linguists call this kind of rightward mo

Related Questions