park sang joon I questioned the following on one of other sites, but I didn't get proper answer. It would be helpful if you gave a link to the other discussion so that we know what has been said already.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
park sang joonI questioned the following on one of other sites, but I didn't get proper answer.It would be helpful if you gave a link to the other discussion so that we know what has been said already.
park sang joonin terms of the relative tense, not the absolute tense.I don't know what you mean by this part of your question.
park sang joonI'd like to know if the underlined clause represents type 2 conditionalwould have been indicates a type 3 conditional.
park sang joonI think the underli
park sang joonI thought "would have been" represents conditional 3 when the context is told in the present tense, but that it maybe represents conditional 2 when the context is told in the past tense.No. The conditionals are named by their content regardless of the tenses in the sentences that surround them. Conditional 2 occurs quite often with present-ten