0
Anonymous Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

A tiger is a strong animal.

I'd appreciate it if someone would answer my questions. Thanks in advance.

Concerning the sentence A, even if we change "a tiger" to "any tiger", is the meaning still the same?

A: A tiger is a strong animal.

Concerning the sentence B, even if we change "a tiger" to "any tiger", is the meaning still the same?

B: A tiger is an animal that lives in the jungle and has fangs and nails.
  

Top answer

Yes, but no-- it is simply not a natural way to phrase the statement. With 'a tiger' here, we are referring to the species, not individuals.

  • Yes, but no-- it is simply not a natural way to phrase the statement.
  • With 'a tiger' here, we are referring to the species, not individuals.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

10 Answers
0
Yes, but no-- it is simply not a natural way to phrase the statement. With 'a tiger' here, we are referring to the species, not individuals.
0
-- Do you mean in both sentences "A tiger" and "Any tiger" are both OK, but in both sentences "any tiger" is not so natural as "a tiger"?
0
'Any tiger' is not a natural utterance here.
0
--Hi, Mr. Micauber. Thank you for your answers. But I'm not quite sure. B is a sentence for stating a definition of a tiger, so I too think "any tiger" would be unnatural. But A is a sentence for stating an attribute of a tiger, so "any tiger" is not so unnatural, I suppose. Please give it a second thought.
0
No, A is equally odd. There is no difference in how the 2 sentences define tigers, which are strong animals with fangs and claws (not 'nails').
0
The generic use of alan picks out ANY REPRESENTATIVE MEMBER OF THE CLASS.
Thus any can be substituted for alan in examples like
The best way to learn a language is to live among its speakers.

"any" sometimes has a similar but more emphatic meaning.
The greatest threat to any actor is the presumption that knowledge can be a
0
---Thank you, Micauber. Can I conclude "any" can't possibly be used in statinig definition?
0
--Hi, pkr. You said 'Grammatically, "A tiger is a strong animal" may fit the generic sense at the sentence level, but it does sound odd on its own.'

Do you mean this sentence, generic as it may sound, sounds natural only to some people --those who don't know the animal well?

Or do you mean it's possible that this sentence might mean there is a certain (specific) tiger that is st
0
Thank you, Micauber. Can I conclude "any" can't possibly be used in statinig definition?
Nothing is absolute with the English language, but offhand I can think of no reasonable exception to your conclusion.
0
  1. I think "a tiger is a strong animal" means the species as a whole. (generic)
    It sounds odd because you would expect further information. But it is grammatically correct to me.
  2. When "any" is put in the subject position, it's specific and indefinite, but not generic.(This is my personal view)
    Any teacher will tell you that students learn at different rates. (specific and in

Related Questions