Of is correct. I'm not sure of the intricacies here, so I'll let someone else explain it.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
GCheng620I just think that the preposition "of" should be replaced by "to" in accord to the context.No. When scourge is followed by a prepositional phrase, the preposition is almost always "of". The American Corpus lists 370+ instances of "of" and only 8 of "to" and "on." None of the exceptions apply to your sentence.
PhilipOf is correct. I'm not sure of the intricacies here, so I'll let someone else explain it.So does that mean "to" is wrong in this context?
AlpheccaStars GCheng620I just think that the preposition "of" should be replaced by "to" in accord to the context.No. When scourge is followed by a prepositional phrase, the preposition is almost always "of". The American Corpus lists 370+ instances of "of" and only 8 of "to" and "on." None of the exceptions apply to your sentence. eg: We will see an explosion of gene-the
GCheng620So does that mean "to" is wrong in this context?Since "scourge" is used as a concept, not a particular disease or malady, "of" is the proper preposition.