A relative clause modifying "pace"?
But we should also be wary of moving too gradually. Job gains continue to run well ahead of the longer-run pace we estimate would be sufficient, on average, to provide jobs for new entrants to the labour force.
Source: https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiJtPCau-rWAhXSY1AKHezACqIQFggpMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcontent%2Fd9b9f192-a2de-11e7-b797-b61809486fe2&usg=AOvVaw0olUHL1SSAr3ToxV7Qhn35
Hi. I have questions about the underlined part:
Is the underlined part a relative clause modifying "pace"?
Is "that/which" omitted between "pace" and "we" because they function as an object of "estimate" in the relative clause?
Thank you.
Top answer
But we should also be wary of moving too gradually. Job gains continue to run well ahead of the longer-run pace (that) we estimate would be sufficient, on average, to provide jobs for new entrants to the labour force . zuotengdazuo Is the underlined part a relative clause modifying "pace"?
- But we should also be wary of moving too gradually.
- Job gains continue to run well ahead of the longer-run pace (that) we estimate would be sufficient, on average, to provide jobs for new entrants to the labour force .
- zuotengdazuo Is the underlined part a relative clause modifying "pace"?
- Yes.
- zuotengdazuo Is "that/which" omitted between "pace" and "we" because they function as an object of "estimate" in the relative clause?
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
But we should also be wary of moving too gradually. Job gains continue to run well ahead of the longer-run pace (that) we estimate would be sufficient, on average, to provide jobs for new entrants to the labour force.
zuotengdazuoIs the underlined part a relative clause modifying "pace"?
Yes.
zuo
0
Related Questions