0
Recluse Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

A question about grammar.

Tom's series of encounters with persons from John's former life makes him question the value he places on his memories of John.

I don't understand why the author uses "persons" in this sentence, because the usage of plural of person must be "people".Well, it seems to be a simple question, but I couldn't understand it.

Please explain to me why we need persons in this sentence.

Thanks a lot.
  

Top answer

"People" and "persons" are both plural forms of person , Recluse. "People" is used much more often. I think "persons" is more formal.

— Nef

  • "People" and "persons" are both plural forms of person , Recluse.
  • "People" is used much more often.
  • I think "persons" is more formal.
  • Sometimes "persons" is used in cases involving legal language.
  • If you aren't sure which word to use, use people!
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
"People" and "persons" are both plural forms of person, Recluse. "People" is used much more often.

I think "persons" is more formal. Sometimes "persons" is used in cases involving legal language.

If you aren't sure which word to use, use people!
0
0
Here the reference is to a small number of specific individuals. Either persons or people is possible.
See .

CJ
0

Related Questions