0
Tinanam0102 Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

a pond of clear water in it

The first place that I can remember was a large pleasant meadow with a pond of clear water in it. Some shady trees leaned over it, and rushes and water-lilies grew at the deep end.

1. Do all the 'it's in the text mean "a meadow"?
2. What does "at the deep end" mean?

Thanks
  

Top answer

1. No. The first one, yes.

  • 1.
  • No.
  • The first one, yes.
  • The second one is the pond.
  • 2.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

11 Answers
0
1. No. The first one, yes. The second one is the pond.
2. The deep end of the pond. A swimming pool has a "deep end", where the diving board is.
0
Hi enoon,

Why doesn't the first 'it' a pronoun of 'pond' but meadow? Does it have a rule like "referring it to the immediate precedent in sentence'? (sorry I don't know how to phrase this question any better)

P.S. waterlilies should have been the clue.

Thanks
0
You are right to have a problem with this passage. The two "it"s are confusing. The reader sees the second "it" and thinks that it is a repeat of the first one. The writer did not want to repeat "pond", so he repeated "it", instead. We call that jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. It would have been right and good to repeat "pond": The first place that I can remember was a large pleasant
0
The first place that I can remember was a large pleasant meadow with a pond of clear water in it.

It refers to meadow.

Some shady trees leaned over it, and rushes and water-lilies grew at the deep end. Since trees grow in a meadow, not over a meadow, and trees very often lean over a pond, it refers to pond. Trees don't normally g
0
AlpheccaStarsThe rule for the antecedent of a pronoun is: find the nearest noun that is semantically reasonable.
Sure, but the writer has to make sure that the reader doesn't have to hunt for it, even for a fraction of a second.
0
enoonSure, but the writer has to make sure that the reader doesn't have to hunt for it, even for a fraction of a second.
It didn't take me long at all. I was not even conscious of the "hunting."
0
AlpheccaStarsIt didn't take me long at all.
Yes, but some of us are slower! I did have to stop and think about it for a fraction of a second! Getting old, I guess.
0
With a pond of clear water in it, you can clearly see the fish.

Does the sentence seem alright? If the sentence is grammatical, does "it" this time refer to "pond"?

Thanks
Tinanam
0
If a pond has clear water in it, you can clearly see the fish.

I might see the fish with a sonar system, or binoculars, or with my eyes, but certainly not with a pond!
0
Hi AlpeccaStars,

Thanks. I see where the problem is. 'With'

Thanks again.
Have a good day.

Related Questions