0
Park sang joon Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

A past participle that express the future

In addition, people in managerial positions complain repeatedly that they are held responsible for things over which they have little control. As a leader, for example, you might be expected to work with an ill-performing team member, yet you might not have the power to fire him or her. You might also be called on to produce a high-quality service or product but not be given the staff or the funds to get the job done effectively.
[Source: Reading for Results Ninth Edition by Laraine Flemming]
Here, the author used not "to be done," but "done."
So I think the past participle can express a event that may occur someday.
I'd like to know in what case I can get a past participle to express a event that may occur someday.
Thank you in advance for your help.
  

Top answer

Think of it in its passive sense. In itself, it is tenseless. I got/get/will get something done

  • Think of it in its passive sense.
  • In itself, it is tenseless.
  • I got/get/will get something done
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
Think of it in its passive sense. In itself, it is tenseless. I got/get/will get something done
0
Thank you, fivejedjon, for your kind answer.Emotion: smile
I see what you mean.
Then, I'd like to know what difference of the meaning is m
0
'To be done' is incorrect. In English we get things to be done.
0
Thank you, fivejedjon, for your continuing support.
Then how about other verbs?order, tell, allow...?
0
You have to take each verb as it comes.

We get people to do things.
We get things to be done.
We order people to do things.
We order things (to be) done.
We tell people to do things.
We allow people to to things.
We allow things to be done.

Related Questions