Hi, I am reading a book. This scene is taking place in a kitchen. The narrator described:
"He was carrying dishes from a wall cupboard to a laid dining table".
I think the indefinite article was picked by the author because while you can expect a dining table in a kitchen, you don't necessarily expect it to be laid, so because its state of being laid is mentioned for the first time, "a" is used. But would it be wrong to use "the" right of the bat? There's only table and perhaps it's always laid, so it's a permanent thing. Does that make sense?
Anonymous I think the indefinite article was picked by the author because while you can expect a dining table in a kitchen, you don't necessarily expect it to be laid, so because its state of being laid is mentioned for the first time, "a" is used. That is a promising analysis. Anonymous But would it be wrong to use "the" right of the bat?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousI think the indefinite article was picked by the author because while you can expect a dining table in a kitchen, you don't necessarily expect it to be laid, so because its state of being laid is mentioned for the first time, "a" is used.
That is a promising analysis.
AnonymousBut would it be wrong to use "the" right of