Hi, which article would you use in describing a specific unnamed individual? For example:
1. "My favorite character on the show was that guy with a / the moustache and pitch-black hair"
2. - Which one is your friend? - He's the one standing over there, in a / the red shirt.
My guess is that they can be used interchangeably (except maybe in the second example, where I'd almost invariably use "the"), but I could be wrong. Could you please clarify it for me?
Top answer
Hi, Well, here's one point to consider. If you say '. .
— Clive
Hi, Well, here's one point to consider.
If you say '.
.
that guy with the moustache .
.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Hi, Well, here's one point to consider. If you say '. . . that guy with the moustache . . . ', the definite article suggests that there is only one guy present with a moustache.
Supposing that there is only one character with a moustache, can I say "my favorite character on the show is that guy with a moustache", or is it preferable to use "the" in this case?
Here's a more complex example:
"All the houses are ugly and dilapidated in this part of town... to say nothing of that run-down store with a / the neon sign that keeps blinking on and off."
Also, please keep in mind that, in my example, the person commenting on the condition of the building is not necessarily anywhere near the building. He may simply be talking about it to a person he knows to be familiar with the district. In any case, which article should I use?
Hi, Supposing that there is only one character with a moustache, can I say "my favorite character on the show is that guy with a moustache", or is it preferable to use "the" in this case? You can say either, and there's not much difference at all. I'd use 'the' if I wanted to stress that the moustache is an identifying feature.
Here's a more complex example: "All the houses are
Thanks, Clive. So, if I understand you correctly, the distance of the object doesn't restrict the choice of article. In other words, it would be fine to say "that rundown store with the neon sign that keeps blinking on and off" even if the store wasn't in sight, right? Likewise, it would be acceptable to refer to it as "that rundown store with a neon sign that keeps blinking on and off" even if t
So, if I understand you correctly, the distance of the object doesn't restrict the choice of article. In other words, it would be fine to say "that rundown store with the neon sign that keeps blinking on and off" even if the store wasn't in sight, right? Right. Likewise, it would be acceptable to refer to it as "that rundown store with a neon sign that keeps blinking on and off" e
Interesting. What if, in my last two examples, I substitute "a" / "the" with a possessive adjective. How does it affect the meaning?
"All the houses are ugly and dilapidated in this part of town... to say nothing of that rundown store with its neon sign that keeps blinking on and off."
"Do you remember when I took you to the opera? The production was terrible. The singers
Hi, I don't see any real difference. Perhaps 'her' suggests that she had some responsibility for choosing the outfit she wore for the production. Clive
But doesn't the use of a possessive adjective in these particular examples have the effect of emphasizing the negative quality perceived in the described person, object or situation... or am I imagining this? I realize the difference may be subtle... but if there is one, I'd like to know about it.
a) "(...) to say nothing of that rundown store with its neon sign that keeps blinking on an
Hi, But doesn't the use of a possessive adjective in these particular examples have the effect of emphasizing the negative quality perceived in the described person, object or situation... or am I imagining this? I realize the difference may be subtle... but if there is one, I'd like to know about it. You may be right to some extent. However, if there is that difference, it's a very subtle on