0
Dib Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

"a" or no article before "history/beef with him"

Please tell me which two of these four are correct and also state the reason why.

I don't like him, I have history with him.
or
I don't like him, I have a history with him.

I don't like him, I have beef with him
or
I don't like him, I have a beef with him

Thanks in advance!
  

Top answer

I don't like hi m. I have a history with him. I don't like h im.

  • I don't like hi m.
  • I have a history with him.
  • I don't like h im.
  • I have a beef with him .
  • They are both singular countable nouns in these sentences.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

14 Answers
0
I don't like him. I have a history with him.
I don't like him. I have a beef with him.

They are both singular countable nouns in these sentences.
0
Thanks!

Are these two sentences correct

They have a history with each other.
They have a beef with each other.

Also please check:
Partially substantivized adjectives are often the names of nationalities (the British, the French, the Irish, the Swiss, etc.);

The original sentence didn't have the article "the". Isn't "the" a mu
0
DibAre these two sentences correctThey have a history with each other.They have a beef with each other.
OK.
DibPartially substantivized adjectives are often the names of nationalities (the British, the French, the Irish, the Swiss, etc.); The original sentence didn't have the article "the". Isn't "the" a must in the statement above and
0
Thanks

is this correct:

Partially substantivized adjectives are often the names of the nationalities (the British, the French, the Irish, the Swiss, etc.);

Thanks!
0
No: no article before 'nationalities'.
0
Thanks again

How come can we omit "the" in the original sentence:

Partially substantivized adjectives are often [the] names of nationalities (the British, the French, the Irish, the Swiss, etc.);

Why is "the" not needed here? aren't we supposed to put it in sentences like these because of the preposition "of"?

Thanks!
0
DibWhy is "the" not needed here?
The noun does not refer to all nationalities, nor does it refer to the listed nationalities only; it refers to nationalities generally. The mere presence of 'of' is irrelevant.
0
Thanks again

In that case why is the sentence in the OP where I included the article "the" myself correct, since we are talking about nationalities generally?
I am talking about this statement:

Partially substantivized adjectives are often the names of nationalities (the British, the French, the Irish, the Swiss, etc.);

Thanks!
0
DibI am talking about this statement:Partially substantivized adjectives are often the names of nationalities (the British, the French, the Irish, the Swiss, etc.);
There is no 'the' before nationalities in that statement.
0
Oops sorry! I meant before "names" i.e "the names of nationalities"

Related Questions