I normally say "an herb" or "an honor", where the is commonly dropped. Before most words i would use "a" pronounced as the in "fun". I would not say "an husband" or "an house", a form of dropping i associate with some British speakers. But while i will say "a history book", i would not naturally say "a historical event". I would not say "an history lesson" but i say "an historical account" or "an historian". If i ever did use "a" before "historian", etc., it would more likely be pronounced as in "day". I would also say "he gave me an hello" or "it was an horrific act". There may be others, but these are the few i think of off hand.
It isn't that the the is completely silent, although it may not be quite as pronounced. The common factor is that all the words i precede with "an" are accented on the second syllable. There's something about the flow of syllables that makes "an" feel natural. Also, i tend to write "an" if i would speak it. This may not be consistent with other people's speech, i don't know. Does anyone else find this sort of variation in their own or others' speech ? Is there anything in your grammar books about this ? (I haven't much looked at grammar since about 9th grade. Warner is what we used.) ER Lyon
Top answer
[nq:1]I normally say "an herb" or "an honor", where the is commonly dropped. Before most words i would ... or "it was an horrific act".
— Usenet
[nq:1]I normally say "an herb" or "an honor", where the is commonly dropped.
Before most words i would ...
or "it was an horrific act".
[/nq] , first paragraph.
Bob Lieblich The FAQ is your friend
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]I normally say "an herb" or "an honor", where the is commonly dropped. Before most words i would ... or "it was an horrific act". There may be others, but these are the few i think of off hand.[/nq] , first paragraph.
[nq:2]I normally say "an herb" or "an honor", where the ... but these are the few i think of off hand.[/nq] [nq:1]>, first paragraph.[/nq] Thanks. I've copied the applicable section below: [nq:1]Formerly, "an" was usual before unaccented syllables beginning with "h" ("an historian", "an hotel"); these are "now obsolescent" in British English (Collins English Dictionary), although "a
[nq:2]I normally say "an herb" or "an honor", where the ... but these are the few i think of off hand.[/nq] [nq:1], first paragraph.[/nq] Does it mean that one can choose a/an depending on /their/ pronunciation of a word that admits two? I would never write/say "an herb" (the orrors!), but it should be OK for somebody that pronounces it "urb"?
[nq:2], first paragraph.[/nq] [nq:1]Does it mean that one can choose a/an depending on /their/ pronunciation of a word that admits two? I would never write/say "an herb" (the orrors!), but it should be OK for somebody that pronounces it "urb"?[/nq] That's exactly what it means, yes.
Raymond S. Wise Minneapolis, Minnesota USA E-mail: mplsray @ yahoo . com
[nq:2], first paragraph.[/nq] [nq:1]Does it mean that one can choose a/an depending on /their/ pronunciation of a word that admits two? I would never write/say "an herb" (the orrors!), but it should be OK for somebody that pronounces it "urb"?[/nq] Yes.
[nq:2]I'm American. Am i obsolescent here too ? Are there any other obsolescents out there ? ER Lyon[/nq] [nq:1]Using an obsolescent usage doesn't make you yourself obsolescent. It makes you eccentric.[/nq] A little harsh! To qualify as eccentric, I'd say he'd have to use obsolete usages. Note that a few educated speakers still don't sound the "h" in "hotel": I try the "h" every now and th
[nq:1]I normally say "an herb" or "an honor", where the is commonly dropped. Before most words i would ... or "it was an horrific act". There may be others, but these are the few i think of off hand.[/nq] I speak (and therefore write) this way myself. In cases of the aspired H, I use "a" if the accent in the next word is on the first syllable, or if the word is emphasized, or is derived from
[nq:2]Using an obsolescent usage doesn't make you yourself obsolescent. It makes you eccentric.[/nq] [nq:1]A little harsh! To qualify as eccentric, I'd say he'd have to use obsolete usages. Note that a ... for "historical", I seem to be at an inconsistent transitional stage. I feel sure I don't use it in writing.[/nq] It's still in much more widespread use in the US than in Britain or Aust