0
Anonymous Posted 14 years ago
Grammar
A native english commentator said this.
A native english commentator said these lines, it seems there might be mistakes in each. Can a teacher please tell me where are those mistakes?
1. I don't know what he objected to what the opponent did.
2. He was an integral part with what happened in the last game. They wouldn't have won without him.
3. He is too aggressive in his defending of this opponent.
4. He doesn't predetermine what he is going to do, which is what makes him so good.
5. No matter what the distraction behind me, I'll stay focused.
6. I'd be interested to see if the coach does that.
Many thanks
1. I don't know what he objected to what the opponent did.
2. He was an integral part with what happened in the last game. They wouldn't have won without him.
3. He is too aggressive in his defending of this opponent.
4. He doesn't predetermine what he is going to do, which is what makes him so good.
5. No matter what the distraction behind me, I'll stay focused.
6. I'd be interested to see if the coach does that.
Many thanks
Top answer
1. He misspoke. He mixed up "what he objected to" and "objected to what the opponent did".
- 1.
- He misspoke.
- He mixed up "what he objected to" and "objected to what the opponent did".
- " 2.
- ".
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
5 Answers
0
1. He misspoke. He mixed up "what he objected to" and "objected to what the opponent did". A correct version is, "I don't know what he objected to in what the opponent did."
2. You can't be an integral part "with" anything: "an integral part of what happened ...".
3. OK.
4. OK.
5. OK.
6. OK. (I know the tenses seem off, but that is the normal way of say
2. You can't be an integral part "with" anything: "an integral part of what happened ...".
3. OK.
4. OK.
5. OK.
6. OK. (I know the tenses seem off, but that is the normal way of say
00
Hi
What do you think about : Why did he object to what the opponent did?
and for the last one, here is something else that is similar
Is this correct?
It will be now interesting to see what other tournaments he will play this year.
Thanks in advance enoon
What do you think about : Why did he object to what the opponent did?
and for the last one, here is something else that is similar
Is this correct?
It will be now interesting to see what other tournaments he will play this year.
Thanks in advance enoon
00
AnonymousHiWhat do you think about : Why did he object to what the opponent did?and for the last one, here is something else that is similarIs this correct?It will be now interesting to see what other tournaments he will play this year.Thanks in advance enoonWhy did he object to what the opponent did?
00
Maybe you can use the present tense:
It will be interesting now to see what other tournaments he plays in this year.
Your thoughts enoon?
May I take up a few more minutes of your time to askyou help with :
He made a career on that shot. He would make that shot 9 times out of 10.
After a nice start to the game, a big lead, it is settling back to where it star
It will be interesting now to see what other tournaments he plays in this year.
Your thoughts enoon?
May I take up a few more minutes of your time to askyou help with :
He made a career on that shot. He would make that shot 9 times out of 10.
After a nice start to the game, a big lead, it is settling back to where it star
00
Related Questions