This is a frustrated neighbour feeling obliged to be forthright about the noise pollution which comes from your house on innumerable occasions. The almost weekly trimming of hedges or the mowing of lawns, or whatever else may be going on there, drives me nuts to the point of insanity. Furthermore, it appears, whether it is by chance or not, that the workers make their excessive noise on beautiful days in which we wish to spend in peace and quiet; however, this cannot happen as the noise permeates through the house as I’m sure it does for other houses around the neighbourhood.
I do not ask you to neglect the attractiveness of your glorious garden, but I do wish that you perhaps reduce the occasions on which your workers look after your gardens. After all, I believe you spend little time appreciating the borders of your gardens, which the workers attend frequently.
If I see no change in the frequency that your workers pollute the air, I suppose there is little I can and will do. But if you feel like being considerate and a friendly neighbour, you may like to acknowledge that we would appreciate some quiet.
Yours sincerely
An upset neighbour.
Top answer
Hi Eddie, How do you want this evaluated? In terms of grammar? Naturalness of language?
— Clive
Hi Eddie, How do you want this evaluated?
In terms of grammar?
Naturalness of language?
Appropriateness for its purpose?
All of these?
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Um, I suppose it can be evaluated in terms of grammar. It was a first copy, so I have definitely not perfected it. Any evaluation will be appreciated, but I suppose I mainly want an evaluation in terms of grammar and naturalness of language.
Um, I suppose it can be evaluated in terms of grammar. It was a first copy, so I have definitely not perfected it. Any evaluation will be appreciated, but I suppose I mainly want an evaluation in terms of grammar and naturalness of language.
Hi, OK. Let's look at grammar. I have very few edits. To whom it may concern: This is a frustrated neighbour, feeling obliged to be forthright about the noise pollution which comes from your house on innumerable occasions. The almost weekly trimming of hedges or the mowing of lawns, or whatever else may be going on there, drives me nuts to the point of insanit
I'm not sure where the word 'in' came from in my writing; it must have been a typo.
Secondly, thanks for picking up on my redundancy: permeates through...
Thirdly, the comma you add in is interesting. This one I feel is a case of personal preference as there is no rule for its placement. However, I'd have to agree that it seems like there should be a pause here.
In this case, it is not needed as the participle phrase immediately follows the noun it modifies. Well, the website I posted on a different question you answered said it is not necessary in this case. However, once again, I feel the rule doesn't mean the comma can't exist.
Hi, although I accidentally added the word 'in' to the sentence, I realised I still had a question on a similar matter.
When to use in which?
Here is a definition I received from a website: __________________________________________________________________________________________ You can use “in which” as a precise way to introduce a relative clause after a
Here is a definition I received from a website: __________ You can use “in which” as a precise way to introduce a relative clause after a noun that refers to a place or to a time.
For example instead of saying In my laboratory there is a blue cabinet where old equipment is stored. OK You can