Hi, this is my first question on this forum

We were dissecting an SAT reading passage in class and this came up:
"......These matters are basic to our well-being as land and air animals. As plants will turn to sunlight or rocks or moisture according to their nature, so we bend toward or escape from spatial arrangements according to our emotional needs......"
We had a very long discussion about the best way to interpret the highlighted sentence - I thought that the author was trying to say that these matters are as important to our health as land and air are important to animals. I thought that there was an omitted "to" between "air" and "animals". So basically, the sentence structure would come down to "A is to B as C (is to) D." Reading on from that sentence and thinking about the context, this would be the best interpretation of the sentence in question, or so I thought...
The teacher agreed that this interpretation fit best, but that structure- and grammar-wise, this interpretation would be incorrect. She said that in a sentence with a structure like "A is to B as C is to D", omitting "is to" would be incorrect usage of grammar.
My question: is it really? Is it wrong to leave out "is to" in a sentence like the one I mentioned above? I know it seems unnatural, but I remember having seen similar sentence structures in other places. Does anyone have any ideas about the correct way to interpret the above sentence? I'm desperate here, and really confused.
P.S.: It would be awesome if you could include examples. I know this is a really long and complicated question, but I am desperate and will be forever grateful for any help that can be given!