In the following passage 1. what does "they" refer to? paths or planets? 2.I think there is a grammar mistake.it must be written "the pathswhich are followed by planets without perturbing effect" instead of " they would be without this perturbing effect". Am I right? if I am not right, can you explain this grammatical usage of comparatives? Thanks in advance. Passage: For planets without observable natural satellites, we must be more clever. Although Mercury and Venus (for example) do not have moons, they do exert a small pull on one another, and on the other planets of the solar system. As a result, the planets follow paths that are subtly different than THEY would be without this perturbing effect.
Top answer
[nq:1]In the following passage 1. what does "they" refer to? paths or planets?
— Usenet
[nq:1]In the following passage 1.
what does "they" refer to?
paths or planets?
it ...
system.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]In the following passage 1. what does "they" refer to? paths or planets? 2.I think there is a grammar mistake.it ... system. As a result, the planets follow paths that are subtly different than THEY would be without this perturbing effect.[/nq] It's not comparatives. Comparatives are smart, smarter, smartest if regular, or good, better, best if irregular. What you have is a p