0
Usenet Posted 20 years ago
Learning

A grammar question

In the following passage
1. what does "they" refer to? paths or planets?
2.I think there is a grammar mistake.it must be written "the pathswhich are followed by planets without perturbing effect" instead of " they would be without this perturbing effect".
Am I right? if I am not right, can you explain this grammatical usage of comparatives?
Thanks in advance.
Passage:
For planets without observable natural satellites, we must be more clever. Although Mercury and Venus (for example) do not have moons, they do exert a small pull on one another, and on the other planets of the solar system. As a result, the planets follow paths that are subtly different than THEY would be without this perturbing effect.
  

Top answer

[nq:1]In the following passage 1. what does "they" refer to? paths or planets?

  • [nq:1]In the following passage 1.
  • what does "they" refer to?
  • paths or planets?
  • it ...
  • system.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
[nq:1]In the following passage 1. what does "they" refer to? paths or planets? 2.I think there is a grammar mistake.it ... system. As a result, the planets follow paths that are subtly different than THEY would be without this perturbing effect.[/nq]
It's not comparatives. Comparatives are smart,
smarter, smartest if regular, or good, better,
best if irregular.
What you have is a p

Related Questions