0
Tkacka15 Posted 8 years ago
Vocabulary

A comma

"Britain’s leader during the period when the collapse of the US investment bank Lehman Brothers put every major bank at risk, said that after a decade of stagnation the global economy was now moving into a decade of vulnerability."

(The Guardian.)

Is the comma used in the sentence above necessary?

--------------------------------

I see Britain’s leader during the period when the collapse of the US investment bank put every major bank at risk as a subject and noun phrase modified by the relative when-clause. It seems to me that separation of the subject from the predicate by the comma is unnecessary (if not redundant) in that sentence.

  

Top answer

Strictly speaking the comma is incorrect because, as you say, it interposes between subject and verb. No doubt it has been inserted because the writer felt it aided readability.

  • Strictly speaking the comma is incorrect because, as you say, it interposes between subject and verb.
  • No doubt it has been inserted because the writer felt it aided readability.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0

Strictly speaking the comma is incorrect because, as you say, it interposes between subject and verb. No doubt it has been inserted because the writer felt it aided readability.

0
You're spot-on! Not only is the comma unnecessary, it's actually incorrect. It's also one of the worst sentences I've seen recently. And this was taken from The Guardian? Tsk tsk!

Related Questions