0
Son James Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

A clause coming after "to be" verb?

Please look at the following sentences and find out which one is wrong.

But what's most important is, we should stop at a supermarket and buy some meat.
= But what is most important is that we should stop at a supermarket and buy some meat.
= But what is most important is the fact we should stop at a supermarket and buy some meat.
? But what is most important is we should stop at a supermarket and buy some meat.( I think I can't write like this. Because a clause can't come after "to be" verb.)

Am I right?

Thank you for your teaching in advance.
  

Top answer

Son James But what is most important is that we should stop at a supermarket and buy some meat. This is the most natural (you could eliminate 'should'). I wouldn't use the last sentence, for the reason you mention.

  • Son James But what is most important is that we should stop at a supermarket and buy some meat.
  • This is the most natural (you could eliminate 'should').
  • I wouldn't use the last sentence, for the reason you mention.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Son JamesBut what is most important is that we should stop at a supermarket and buy some meat.
This is the most natural (you could eliminate 'should').
I wouldn't use the last sentence, for the reason you mention.
0
I don’t see anything wrong with the last sentence (other than that redundant should); that is just implicit, as it is in, for example, I thought [that] you left.
0
Thank you for your kind answer,Mr.PhilipEmotion: embarrassed
0
Then, I can write a clause after "to be" or a normal verb. Thank you for your answer,Mr.Aspara Gus

Related Questions