0
Worship Posted 20 years ago
Grammar
A Baffling Conditional Sentence
0 Here is the question that ı read yesterday but to my amazement,ı saw this structure twice in just one day,so it makes me fuss.thanks in advance! 02 br
02 br
00 If a pedestrian 01 font 00 steps 02 font 00 in front of a carefully driven automobile,the accident 01 font 00 would be 02 font 00 considered an excusable homicide. 0-
02 br
00 If a pedestrian 01 font 00 steps 02 font 00 in front of a carefully driven automobile,the accident 01 font 00 would be 02 font 00 considered an excusable homicide. 0-
Top answer
02 font 02 br 02 br 01 font 00 I don't consider this correct. ) 02 font 02 br 02 br 01 font 00 Best wishes, Clive 02 font 0-
- 02 font 02 br 02 br 01 font 00 I don't consider this correct.
- ) 02 font 02 br 02 br 01 font 00 Best wishes, Clive 02 font 0-
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
6 Answers
0
1 font 00 Hi Worship, 02 font 02 br
02 br
01 font 00 Welcome to the Forum. 02 font 02 br
02 br
01 font 00 I don't consider this correct. It should be either 02 font 02 br
02 br
00 If a pedestrian 01 font 00 stepped 02 font
02 br
01 font 00 Welcome to the Forum. 02 font 02 br
02 br
01 font 00 I don't consider this correct. It should be either 02 font 02 br
02 br
00 If a pedestrian 01 font 00 stepped 02 font
00
0 I suppose much depends on who the pedestrian is. 02 br
02 br
00 MrP 0-
02 br
00 MrP 0-
00
thanks dear Clive and Mr. Pedantic but what you mean by telling it depends upon the pedestrian.If you make it clear,i'd like to be more happy.Thanks.
00
Here is the original text.
A killing that has legal justification is called justifiable homicide.For example,a killing in self-defense would be a justifiable homicide.The law regards a purely accidental killing as an excusable homicide.For example,if a pedestrian steps in front of a carefully driven automobile and is killed,the accident would be considered an excusab
A killing that has legal justification is called justifiable homicide.For example,a killing in self-defense would be a justifiable homicide.The law regards a purely accidental killing as an excusable homicide.For example,if a pedestrian steps in front of a carefully driven automobile and is killed,the accident would be considered an excusab
00
Hi,
but what you mean by telling it depends upon the pedestrian.If you make it clear,i'd like to be more happy.
Don't worry about it, it was just a little joke. The humorous suggestion was that, for example, if you are in a car and you accidentally hit a grammarian, no-one will care, but if you accidentally hit the Queen of England, you'll get into tr
but what you mean by telling it depends upon the pedestrian.If you make it clear,i'd like to be more happy.
Don't worry about it, it was just a little joke. The humorous suggestion was that, for example, if you are in a car and you accidentally hit a grammarian, no-one will care, but if you accidentally hit the Queen of England, you'll get into tr
00
Thank you very much indeed Clive.So we can say that the question is wrong.Thanks for everything.
0
Related Questions