0
Usenet Posted 21 years ago
Usage

-30- used as meaning end of story.

http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=19970314

And, currently being discussed here:
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=300928

My big problem is this claim at the first link:
"The use of thirty for the end of a story is an old piece of journalism and telegraphy slang that first appears in the late nineteenth century. In order to signal the end of a transmission, it was necessary to have a code for the end of a transmission that was unmistakably not part of the transmission itself. This code was the sequence XXX, which, many decades before the rise of the pornographic film industry, was unlikely to occur as a part of the actual story."
It just so turns out on the Straight Dope Message boards we found an authoritative site listing 30 as a procedural sign (prosign) in Morse code as early as 1959, meaning "No more - the end". The above randomhouse.com link mentions 30 "first appears in the late nineteenth century". 1859 was in the middle of the nineteenth century. And, nobody has yet to be able to document that in Morse code XXX was ever used as a prosign. Why use XXX when the standard says to use 30?However, the one thing that has me wondering is might have newspapers before the telegraph became popular (late 1840s to 1850s) been using XXX as and end of story marker, and then switched over later to using 30 because that is what the telegraphers used? Weren't there any instructional manuals before telegraphy became popular that told reporters exactly what to put at the end of a story? Or books written by newspaper folks saying what they put at the end of stories? Heck, I'd have thought that there would still be the original story copy left of some early 1800s news stories.

Such as those that were about a great tragedy, an important political event, etc. that someone saved for posterity. If XXX was ever used as an end of story marker, there ought to be some proof still around documenting it.

Thus, does anyone have a credible cite that says that newspaper folks ever, at any time, were ending stories with XXX to mean "end of story"?
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.
  

Top answer

[nq:1]"The use of thirty for the end of a story is an old piece of journalismand telegraphy slang that first ... a transmission that was unmistakably not part of the transmission itself. This code was the sequence *** .

  • [nq:1]"The use of thirty for the end of a story is an old piece of journalismand telegraphy slang that first ...
  • a transmission that was unmistakably not part of the transmission itself.
  • This code was the sequence *** .
  • [/nq] Even if this is true, the convention would not be "slang" which is a special lexicon.
  • g.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
[nq:1]"The use of thirty for the end of a story is an old piece of journalismand telegraphy slang that first ... a transmission that was unmistakably not part of the transmission itself. This code was the sequence *** . . .[/nq]
Even if this is true, the convention would not be "slang" which is a special lexicon.
Wire services (e.g. Associated Press. The Canadian Press) signalled at least
0
[nq:1]Thus, does anyone have a credible cite that says that newspaper folks ever, at any time, were ending stories with *** to mean "end of story"?[/nq]

Sal
Ye olde swarm of links: thousands of links for writers, researchers and the terminally curious
0
[nq:1]Thus, does anyone have a credible cite that says that newspaper folks ever, at any time, were ending stories with *** to mean "end of story"?[/nq]
"The end of the release is designated in one of several ways. Use the word "end" or the number "30" either in quotation marks or within dashes, or the symbol ##."
His examples use either -30- or ##.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefh
0
[nq:2]Thus, does anyone have a credible cite that says that ... were ending stories with *** to mean "end of story"?[/nq]
[nq:1]http://listserv.dom.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind9508&L=STUMPERS-L&P=R47202[/nq]
Thanks. The problem with that is the author is just saying this

Related Questions