0
English 1b3 Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

1st or 2nd Conditional?

I was glad I had left early. If I got lost, I would have extra time.



Is this 1st or second conditional?



Why?

---



Thank you
  

Top answer

English 1b3 If I got lost, I would have extra time. Is this 1st or second conditional? Second.

  • English 1b3 If I got lost, I would have extra time.
  • Is this 1st or second conditional?
  • Second.
  • IF {present}, ...
  • WILL ...
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
English 1b3 If I got lost, I would have extra time.

Is this 1st or second conditional?
Second.

IF {present}, ... WILL ... = first conditional
IF {past*}, ... WOULD ... = second conditional

CJ

*Always "were" if the verb is "to be".
0
But this is referring to a present situation in the past. Isn't it a 1st conditional 'backshifted' into the past, since it still refers to a real word, likely scenario?
0
You have your answer above. There is no other answer.

CJ
0
??? Are you saying that just because I change the tense of the passage the conditional changes?

I leave home early to make sure if I get lost, I will have extra time.



I left home early to make sure if I got lost, I would have extra time.

The likelihood of it happening is still likely. It is just shifted to the past, due to 'left.'
0
From one on-line grammar page:

Use conditional sentences to speculate about the future result of a condition that is
not true in the present
. In this type of conditional sentence, the subordinate clause
contains the past-tense verb 'were' (never 'was'), and the independent clause contains
the modal 'would',' could', or 'might', plus the base form of the verb.
0
English 1b3I was glad I had left early. If I got lost, I would have extra time.
I imagine you could look at your two sentences this way:

Real present time (as a quote):

"I am glad I left early. If I get lost, I will have extra time."

In a first person narration of the past, that same pair of sentences could be written t
0
So what conditional would you call it, Yankee?
0
Hi English 1b3

Well, the form is certainly the same as a standard second conditional.

I think you've already correctly identified the sense of this conditional at the time it was actually said (or thought) -- that the speaker viewed getting lost as a real possibility at that time in the past.

Perhaps you might simply think of the use of the second conditional form in th
0
this is second conditional because we always use would for second conditional and we use will which is in the present

Related Questions