That India provides garments to international fashion houses at competitive prices, with a shorter lead time, and an effective monopoly on certain designs, is accepted the whole world over. India has always been regarded as the default source in the embroidered garments segment, but changes in the rate of exchange between the rupee and the dollar has further depressed prices, thereby attracting more buyers. So the international fashion houses walk away with customised goods, and craftwork is sold at very low rates.
The passage seems contradictory! It says that many buyers are attracted to India fabric but then states that international fashion houses can walk away with it!!
There is no contradiction. It says that many buyers are attracted to India fabric Yes then states that international fashion houses walk away with customised goods, and craftwork is sold at very low rates. " walk away with .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
There is no contradiction.
It says that many buyers are attracted to India fabric Yes
then states that international fashion houses walk away with customised goods, and craftwork is sold at very low rates. "walk away with . . ." here does not mean rejection, it means that fashion houses get very good deals.
Consider this simpler example.