Fairy Princess Why does a particular war need the article " the " ? It doesn't logically need it; it's more like a tradition that we use "the". World War I and World War II don't have an article, but most other wars do.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Fairy PrincessWhy does a particular war need the article "the"?It doesn't logically need it; it's more like a tradition that we use "the".
CalifJimWorld War I and World War II don't have an article, but most other wars do.The grammatical reason for zero article in World War I and World War II is the cardinal numeral. The First World War and the Second World War
Cool BreezeThe First World WarYes. Also, the Great War.
GPYIt seems to me that "the Korean War" has an article according to the usual rules relating to singular countable nouns.But that's for common nouns, isn't it? Not for proper nouns. Or are we wrong to capitalize War? Should we write the Korean war?
CalifJimBut that's for common nouns, isn't it? Not for proper nouns. Or are we wrong to capitalize War? Should we write the Korean war?No, I think "War" should be capitalised, but just that the default, or expected, treatment of proper nouns that are also ordinary phrases in English, capitalisation aside, is to apply articles as if they were ordinary phrases.
Vic ZIf you call WW1 and WW2 "The First World War" and "The Second.." Then it looks like we have a rule that the name of all wars stars with "The".I don't think it's anything to do with "War", specifically. "The First World Anything" would be expected to have an article, as would "the Korean Anything", where "Anything" is a singular countable noun, just by th