I think in the first sentence, 'happy about that' is a defining relative clause and in the second, it isn't.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
4444mv I think in the first sentence, 'happy about that' is a defining relative clause and in the second, it isn't.Mostly correct, but it's not a full clause. Can you tell Anonymous more? Maybe he doesn't know what "defining" means, or what implications that has for the number of people we might be referring to if it's defining and if it's not defining.
CalifJim 4444mv I think in the first sentence, 'happy about that' is a defining relative clause and in the second, it isn't.Mostly correct, but it's not a full clause. Can you tell Anonymous more? Maybe he doesn't know what "defining" means, or what implications that has for the number of people we might be referring to if it's defining and if it's not defining.CJ
4444mv I´ll try.Good try! Now what about the people in the original sentences?
CalifJim 4444mv I´ll try.Good try! Now what about the people in the original sentences?1- People happy about that are going there tomorrow.2- People, happy about that, are going there tomorrow. Are they the same people in both sentences? Or are they two different groups of people? How does that work? CJOh my ***! Let me think...
4444mv I'm not altogether sure about what this that stands for.Nobody is sure about this. Don't worry about that part. "that" is something mentioned previously, but we don't know what it is. That's OK.
4444mvThe first sentence refers to a group of people that are happy about something (goin
CalifJim 4444mv I'm not altogether sure about what this that stands for.Nobody is sure about this. Don't worry about that part. "that" is something mentioned previously, but we don't know what it is. That's OK.4444mvThe first sentence refers to a group of people that are happy about something (going there or something that has been mentioned before), only the ones that ar