0
Anonymous Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

Hello,

A website about commas involving non-restrictive vs. restrictive modifiers said this:

"A non-restrictive modifier adds information that is not essential to our
understanding of the sentence; if we remove it from the sentence, the
basic meaning of the sentence does not change.
A restrictive modifier identifies, or limits the reference of, the noun it
modifies.

Ex: Non-restrictive: In spring, when the water is high, the lake surges over the rocks.
Restrictive: At times when the water is high the lake surges over the rocks."

Question:
Shouldn't the 2nd example have a comma after 'high'? Also, what if the sentence read, 'When the water is high the lake surges over the rocks." shouldn't there be a commas after 'high' (I thought sentences with introductory bits starting with 'when' ended with a comma.)
If a comma is or is not needed, please explain why.

Thank you.
  

Top answer

Anonymous Shouldn't the 2nd example have a comma after 'high'? I agree. The point of the example may be that there should be no comma before "when", and perhaps the other comma also got taken out by mistake.

  • Anonymous Shouldn't the 2nd example have a comma after 'high'?
  • I agree.
  • The point of the example may be that there should be no comma before "when", and perhaps the other comma also got taken out by mistake.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
AnonymousShouldn't the 2nd example have a comma after 'high'?
I agree. The point of the example may be that there should be no comma before "when", and perhaps the other comma also got taken out by mistake.

Related Questions