About the market size, any city and regional planning teaching programs should include core courses about innovation-led cities and regions (second tier of taxonomy). At this level, the market is wide. Planning of physical entities, such as science and technology parks, is more suitable to optional courses because the model of ‘technopolitan development’ and its pillars (linear innovation, technology-led, property and infrastructure-intensive) is no longer mainstream. However, these subjects retain a high interest among scientists in the field. Google Scholar publications during 2012-2013 indicate that “technopoles” and “science parks” are discussed in large number of papers: "technopoles" in 1040 papers; "science parks" in 1410 papers; "science cities" in 111 papers; "technology cities" in 71 papers. These numbers are much higher than all catching terms such as "knowledge cities" discussed in 339 papers and "innovation clusters" in 719 papers. It seems that the market for this subject is large extending beyond academia and capturing the interest of science and technology parks managers and innovation professionals.